A digitally controlled silicon quantum processing unit
- Michael Abraham
- Edwin Acuna
- Tower S. Adams
- Moonmoon Akmal
- Matthew R. Alfaro
- I. Alvarado
- Jacob Amontree
- Carter Andrews
- Reed W. Andrews
- Michael Antcliffe
- André R. Asencio
- Ryan M. Avila Batres
- Cynthia D. Baringer
- David W. Barnes
- Katherine M. Beech
- Russell G. Blakey
- Zachery T. Bloom
- Aaron J. Bluestone
- Jacob Z. Blumoff
- Matthew G. Borselli
- Koel A. Bose
- Brydon Boyd
- Jacob T. Boyer
- Teresa L. Brecht
- Christopher C. Brough
- Rex A. Brown
- Steven L. Brown
- Tyler A. Cain
- John B. Carpenter
- Stephen Carr
- Faustin W. Carter
- Mitchell Casanova
- Jacob L. Chambers
- Matthew D. Chambers
- Khamsorn L. Chanthavong
- James M. Chappell
- Rhian Chavez
- Kevin C. Chen
- Peter S. Chen
- Maxwell D. Choi
- Krishna Choudhary
- Matthew N. H. Chow
- Justin E. Christensen
- Aaron M. Chronister
- Andrew M. Clapper
- Abigail A. Coker
- Michael D. Cornelius
- Albert E. Cosand
- Ian T. Counts
- Edward T. Croke
2026-07-29
Commercially relevant quantum computers will require large numbers of high-performing qubits that can be manufactured, integrated and controlled at scale. Silicon exchange-only qubits 1–10 are a strong candidate modality owing to their control-signal simplicity and compatibility with advanced semiconductor manufacturing 11–13 , but questions remain around the achievability of sufficiently low noise and a scalable control and wiring solution 13–19 . Here we introduce a quantum processing unit composed of a custom-designed cryogenic complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) controller, a high-density superconducting ribbon cable and a low-noise exchange-only qubit device. The quantum chip features a 3-rail array of 54 exchange-coupled quantum dots, configurable to host up to 18 exchange-only qubits. We integrate and use these components to demonstrate qubit performance for both single-qubit and entangling operations that advances the exchange-only state of the art 7,8,10 by an order of magnitude. We further validate this system by implementing a distance-5 repetition code 20 and a distance-2 quantum error-detecting code 21–26 and then make detailed comparisons with simulations. Our work facilitates the development of future utility-scale quantum computers with manageable operational and capital requirements.